Dear Flipside Media
I
am writing to you to explaining all the legal and contractual issues with the
job advertisement that you have written. I’d like to make points on all the
faults you have made during writing this letter. A contract is a signed
document that is to do with employment and is intended to be done by law. An Exclusivity
clause is something that an employee can use when working for a company and
cannot do Freelance work for anyone else. A confidentiality clause is a paragraph
within a contract that a business is allowed to keep confidential and may not
be given to other people that do not work in the company.
To start with the requirements for this job role are rather
specific which does not comply with The Equality
Act. The Equality Act states that you’re not allowed to ask for someone under a
certain age, this is not allowed to be stated in a job description as this is
discrimination. Also the salary for this job is very broad and could fall short
of the Equal pay act 1970. You cannot
pay someone a different sum of money for doing the same job as an employee who
you had before your new one or if you have two people doing the same job at the
same time as that is unfair on the employee who is getting paid less for doing
the same work. A trade union is there to fight for the rights of workers, but you
have to be a member of one of these unions to get the benefits of its work. An
example of a Trade Union is BECTU which has a freelance membership which will
cost about £10 every month. All so in your letter you say you are looking for a
Christian person for this job, this is not allowed as you are not by law
allowed to promote your faith to anyone and are not allowed to force it upon
anyone.
With regards idea for your video for a date rape campaign that
you’re planning to show to high school students, as you said 'Plan and produce a short documentary that can be shown to children at high school promoting the No Means No date rape campaign'. You can’t do that because
there are ethical issues with this and does not agree with the Codes of
Practice. Also showing teenagers that have been affected or have been the assaulter,
give a bad image to demographics that concern these people, also teenagers have
been portrayed by the press as being bad enough and don’t really need you
worsening their case. You also mentioned that you plan to have re-enactments
for this video and that is just absolutely wrong.You will also have to deal
with all the different legal issues like the fact that under 18’s are protected
by Ofcom. Also the Communications Act states that Ofcom’s
primary purpose is to make sure that the interests of the people are always
there such as promotion during the broadcast of a show.
Looking at the nature of this video I would rate this video
as a 15 as it will include
- strong
violence/ language
- scenes
of sexual activity
- strong
references to sex
- nudity
- discriminative
language
Thank you for taking the time to read this letter and would hope you know go about fixing all the issues that I have stated during the writing of this letter.
Yours sincerely
Andrew Davis
Andy,
ReplyDeleteYou've covered most of what's needed here and linked to relevant legislation and regulatory code, therefore I have awarded a pass for this post. More detail and quotes needed for merit.
EllieB